The Progressive FAO Management Pathway for Aquaculture Biosecurity

Type de document
Working document
The Progressive FAO Management Pathway for Aquaculture Biosecurity_Guidelines for application

The Progressive Management Pathway for Aquaculture Biosecurity (PMP/AB) builds on existing frameworks, capacity and appropriate tools, using risk-based approaches and public–private sector partnerships. It is expected to result in the sustainable (i) reduction of burden of diseases; (ii) improvement of aquatic health and welfare at farm, national and regional levels; (iii) minimization of global spread of diseases; (iv) optimization of socioeconomic benefits from aquaculture; (v) attraction of investment opportunities into aquaculture; and (vi) achievement of One Health goals.
In the context of the PMP/AB, biosecurity refers to the cost-effective management of risks posed by pathogens to aquaculture through a strategic approach at the enterprise, local-sector, national and international levels with shared
public–private responsibilities.

This guidance document for PMP/AB application contains the rationale, vision, mission, scope, goals and benefits of the PMP/AB. The four stages of the PMP/AB are described in detail, including the overall objectives and key outcomes to complet each stage. It also presents a general stepwise process and recommended activities for completing the different stages. The PMP/AB checklist is divided into four broad categories, namely: Sectors and Stakeholders; Aquatic Health Services; Surveillance, Monitoring and Diagnostics; and Management and Evaluation.

The PMP/AB has four scenarios that provide opportunity and flexibility to any country, at whatever stage of aquaculture development, to initiate the PMP/AB by using these scenarios as entry-points: (i) countries with no national aquaculture
biosecurity strategy in place, but an aquaculture sector exists or is in the early stages of development; (ii) countries with a national aquaculture biosecurity strategy in place with some level of implementation; (iii) countries with an advanced
national aquaculture biosecurity strategy in place with full implementation; and (iv) countries whose aquaculture biosecurity is dependent on the biosecurity situation in neighbouring countries due to shared waterbodies, watersheds or coastlines and where a regional or sub-regional aquaculture biosecurity strategy is needed. Available tools that can assist in pilot testing and eventual implementation
are also presented.

Date de publication (du fichier / URL)
1 janvier 2023
Aichi targets
1.1. People are aware of the values of biodiversity
1.2. People are aware of the steps they can take to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity
2. Biodiversity values integrated
2.1. Biodiversity values integrated into national and local development and poverty reduction strategies
2.2. Biodiversity values integrated into national and local planning processes
4. Sustainable production and consumption
6.1. All fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed and harvested sustainably, legally and applying ecosystem based approaches
6.3. Fisheries have no significant adverse impacts on threatened species and vulnerable ecosystems
6.4. The impacts of fisheries on stocks, species and ecosystems are within safe ecological limits, i.e. overfishing avoided
7. Sustainable agriculture, aquaculture and forestry
11.4. Protected areas are ecologically representative
20. Financial resources from all sources increased
20.1. Mobilization of financial resources implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity from all sources have increased substantially from 2010 levels
Pays
Burundi
Canada
Democratic Republic of the Congo
France
India
Italy
Japan
Kenya
Rwanda
Senegal